911 loose change 2nd edition spanish




















There was a palpable sense on the left that America had lost its way under the Bush administration. People all across the political spectrum were skeptical of government, and the mass discontent gave Loose Change rare bipartisan appeal. It was about people who believed what they were told and people who were skeptical of the government.

P2P sites and streaming video allowed people to share the film with ease, but even so, the film spread mostly by old-school word of mouth, according to Mike Cernovich , a pro-Trump social-media personality who rose to prominence by peddling anti-Hillary Clinton memes and, in particular, the Pizzagate conspiracy. Loose Change is incredibly powerful. The film turned Avery, Bermas, and Rowe into underground superstars. All of the people named in the previous three paragraphs declined to comment for this article.

The Loose Change trio spent touring the country, attending Truther rallies, speaking on college campuses, and conducting film screenings. The three of them moved into a converted trailer on a acre parcel in Oneonta. They called it Camp Freedom. For nearly two months, a team of researchers explored whether there was any merit to these theories.

Meigs says he was open-minded heading into the project. He was particularly intrigued by the conspiracist claim that United Flight 93, which crashed in an open field outside of Shanksville, Pennsylvania, after the passengers tried to wrest control of the aircraft from the hijackers, was actually shot down by a military aircraft.

There was an engine part found yards south of the crash site, which is perfectly reasonable for an aircraft traveling more than feet per second. Paper and scraps of sheet metal were found in nearby Indian Lake, but that was 1. The second aircraft people saw? The plane was flying to an airport 20 miles north of Shanksville. The story generated millions of unique visitors that month, Meigs says, and remained the most popular story on the site each month for years. Just as quickly, it precipitated a torrent of hate mail.

We were connected with Bush-Cheney, we were connected to Mossad. And then Loose Change accelerated everything. Loose Change continued to grow in stature despite Pop Mech 's story, a portent for how easily establishment media can be overwhelmed by the lawless, fragmented nature of the Internet. No amount of fact-checking could combat the appeal of mystery and the speed with which people shared misinformation online.

The opposing camps eventually confronted each other in an in-person, videotaped debate hosted by Democracy Now , a leftist news site. Avery and Bermas squared off against Meigs and Popular Mechanics executive editor David Dunbar , who led the research efforts for the article. The filmmakers wanted to capitalize on their fame and create a new, more polished version of the film that would play in theaters, and for a moment it seemed as if that might happen.

Charlie Sheen expressed interest in narrating the film , the filmmakers say, with billionaire Mark Cuban providing the distribution, but a deal never materialized. But I did see a market for watching movies like this.

They were going to get Charlie and make it a more marketable movie. That never happened. So discussions never went further. Rowe claims the deal fell apart because Warner Bros. The movie has a dismal 11 percent rating on movie-review site Rotten Tomatoes , with critics calling it hollow and emotionally manipulative. Jones financed the film and was its executive producer. But the fervor quickly dissipated.

The Loose Change crew went their separate ways after that. The Truther movement splintered as well. Bermas did a stint at InfoWars and remains active on the conspiracy scene. He now hosts a YouTube channel with 56, subscribers, where you can hear him rant about politics. Rowe makes independent films. The film spread misinformation to millions and infected them with the idea that widely agreed-upon facts can, in fact, be total fabrications.

The lasting influence of that phenomenon is still evident today, in everything from the modern-day conspiracy-theory boom to the mainstreaming of Alex Jones to the political ascendance of Donald Trump. A major part of that influence is stylistic. The synth-heavy score, the found-footage clips, and the foreboding voice-over piecing it all together became de rigeur in the conspiracist genre.

It looked professional, and that made it seem more credible. All are made in the style of Loose Change , as are many of the countless user-generated conspiracy videos, created by at-home sleuths, that flooded YouTube in the s. At the time, it was believed a Dutch communist named Marinus van der Lubbe set fire to the German parliament building.

Loose Change asserts that the Nazis themselves set the fire and used it as a pretext to revoke civil liberties and install fascism.

Want more? Advanced embedding details, examples, and help! Topics 36 , Loose , Change , 2nd , Edition. This film shows direct connection between the attacks of September 11, and the United States government. Evidence is derived from news footage, scientific fact, and most important, Americans who suffered through that tragic day. Addeddate Color color Identifier LooseChange2ndEdition Sound sound.

There are no reviews yet. Heres a quote from Tom Flocco regarding Dylan Avery's brand new documentary; " This film shows direct connection between the attacks of September 11, and the United States government. Evidence is derived from news footage, scientific fact, and most important, Americans who suffered through that tragic day. If you're having trouble watching the video, try copying the following URL into your browser:. Everything I have researched on this topic a load and what I just read here the disagreement underscores the urgent need for the setting up of a Grand Jury with legal power to investigate all the evidence around what happened and who did it - and that is what Loose Change which is only a general survey of the doubts of the official story calls for.

It is true that the official neo-con account seems significantly unsound. I just want to add that many good people find it difficult to believe that a government could do evil things to their own people, but if you don't face the possibility and look at it hard and long and deal with it head on, such possible corruption will only grow worse.

First you have to understand what a false-flag operation is and the history of false-flag operations. The name is derived from the military concept of flying false colors; that is, flying the flag of a country other than one's own.

Here is only one example: The planned, but never executed, Operation Northwoods plot by the U. Kennedy, and finally came to light through the Freedom of Information Act as publicized by James Bamford. I would like nothing more. But to date there are just too many unanswered questions to swallow the official story on faith.



0コメント

  • 1000 / 1000